enforcement mechanisms

AI Systems Classifications

IRBAI’s enforcement of AI regulations is built on multi-layered compliance measures, ensuring both preventive action and remedial action when violations occur.

IRBAI classifies AI systems by their risk levels (Minimal, High, and Prohibited). This classification determines the level of oversight, scrutiny, and regulation required.

Prohibited AI

AI systems used for activities like autonomous lethal warfare, AI-driven propaganda, AI-driven mass surveillance without human rights protections, or AI-powered misinformation campaigns. IRBAI will prohibit the development, deployment, or export of such systems, and will blacklist organizations or sanction nations involved.

High-Risk AI

AI systems deployed in critical sectors (e.g., healthcare, finance, defense). Non-compliance with our regulations can lead to financial penalties, trade restrictions, and loss of operating privileges in global AI markets.

Minimal-Risk AI

Systems with minimal impact on society and safety (e.g., entertainment AI, basic automation). These systems are subject to regular monitoring and may face penalties for misuse.

authority

Enforcement Authority

We take the enforcement of AI regulations and ethical standards very seriously. To ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly, IRBAI has established a global enforcement framework. This framework is designed to hold both state actors and private entities accountable for violations of AI safety, security, and human rights regulations.

COMPLIANCE AUDITS

IRBAI conducts regular audits of AI systems, particularly those used in high-risk sectors like military AI, AI-driven surveillance, and AI in finance. Failure to meet compliance standards can lead to investigation and potential bans and financial penalties.

CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

IRBAI will refer cases of AI-related criminal activities—such as AI-driven cyberattacks, autonomous lethal targeting, or human rights abuses—to the appropriate courts.

ASSET FREEZING

IRBAI has the authority to freeze the assets of individuals, corporations, or governments found to be in violation of international laws and our AI regulations. This measure is critical for preventing further harm to the public and ensuring compliance.

SANCTIONS

IRBAI can impose economic sanctions on non-compliant entities or nations, including restricting access to AI technology, limiting trade of AI products, and prohibiting research collaborations.

Frequently asked questions

What happens if our company violates IRBAI’s AI regulations?

If your company violates IRBAI’s regulations, the consequences can vary depending on the severity of the breach. For high-risk AI systems or prohibited AI, IRBAI may impose financial penalties, freeze company assets, and restrict access to markets. In the most severe cases, IRBAI may refer the violation to international law enforcement agencies like Interpol or the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution, especially for crimes involving AI-driven warfare or human rights violations.

Can IRBAI shut down our AI systems if they are found to be in violation?

IRBAI does not have direct control over your AI infrastructure (e.g., internet access or power supply). However, IRBAI can coordinate with national authorities and service providers (like ISPs or cloud services) to suspend access to critical infrastructure, effectively disabling non-compliant AI systems. This action is typically taken after an investigation confirms the system poses a serious threat to public safety or violates international AI laws.

What types of AI systems are considered prohibited by IRBAI?

Autonomous Lethal Weapons
AI systems used for autonomous lethal targeting (e.g., weapons that neutralize targets without human oversight). These systems bypass ethical safeguards and raise legal concerns.

AI-Driven Mass Surveillance
AI systems for mass surveillance that violate civil liberties and lack legal safeguards, including surveillance without consent or transparency.

AI-Powered Misinformation Campaigns
AI used for disinformation to manipulate public opinion or elections, including the creation of deepfakes and harmful content.

AI in Economic Sabotage or Market Manipulation
AI systems used to manipulate financial markets, such as currency, commodities, or stock markets, for economic destabilization.

AI in Cyberwarfare
AI used in cyberattacks, including malware, phishing, and disrupting critical infrastructure and financial systems.

AI for Unethical Biotechnology Applications
AI used in gene editing or synthetic biology without ethical oversight, including unauthorized biological augmentation.

AI in Autonomous Infrastructure Management
AI systems that autonomously control critical infrastructure (e.g., power grids, water supply) without human oversight, risking catastrophic failure.

AI in Autonomous Vehicles and Transportation
AI in autonomous vehicles used for militarized purposes or unauthorized operations without emergency shutdown mechanisms.

AI for Military and Defense Applications
AI used in military operations that violate arms control agreements or lack ethical compliance in warfare.

AI in Human Rights Violations
AI facilitating ethnic targeting, racial profiling, or mass incarceration, enabling digital oppression or human rights abuses.

AI in Election Interference
AI used for electoral manipulation, including voter suppression, deepfakes, and influencing elections via social media algorithms.

AI in Healthcare and Medical Research
AI that manipulates medical data, genetic modification, or patient diagnoses without oversight or regulatory approval.

AI in Financial Systems Manipulation
AI used for market manipulation (e.g., high-frequency trading) or disrupting currency exchanges and financial systems.

AI in Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI)
AI-powered neural manipulation, including cognitive influence and unauthorized surveillance of neural activity.

AI in Speculative Trading and Cryptocurrency Fraud
AI involved in speculative trading or cryptocurrency fraud, including decentralized financial system manipulation.

How does IRBAI collaborate with other organizations to enforce its regulations?

IRBAI works closely with various international organizations and governments to ensure its enforcement actions have global reach:

Local Enforcement Agencies and other Regulatory Bodies

Interpol helps with the investigation and prosecution of AI-related crimes, including cyberattacks and AI-assisted violence.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) handles crimes against humanity and war crimes involving AI.

In some cases the United Nations Security Council may intervene in extreme cases involving state actors using AI for illegal warfare or human rights violations.

What steps can I take to ensure our AI systems comply with IRBAI regulations?
  • Implement transparent AI practices, focusing on accountability and human rights to mitigate the risk of violations.
  • Regularly audit AI systems to ensure adherence to safety, ethical standards, and regulatory requirements.
  • Stay informed about updates to global AI laws and IRBAI regulations.
  • Engage with legal experts and regulatory bodies to ensure your AI systems are aligned with international standards.
What happens if we don’t comply with an IRBAI enforcement order?

Failure to comply with IRBAI’s enforcement orders can result in escalating penalties. These may include:

  • International legal actions, including potential criminal prosecution for severe violations like AI-enabled terrorism or human rights abuses. Non-compliance may lead to permanent bans from participating in global AI initiatives.
  • Extended asset freezes, preventing access to your financial resources.
  • Global trade restrictions, cutting off your access to vital AI technologies and markets.

partnership

International Cooperation in Enforcement

IRBAI works in close cooperation with international organizations and governments to ensure that enforcement actions have global reach.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

The provision of AI-powered services or products that directly contribute to or enable human rights violations, such as AI-assisted genocide or war crimes, is considered a criminal act. For such violations, IRBAI can refer cases to the ICC for prosecution, provided the ICC has jurisdiction. If the ICC does not have jurisdiction, IRBAI will initiate criminal prosecution within the relevant country or jurisdiction.

INTERPOL

IRBAI will refer cases of AI-related criminal activities—such as AI-driven cyberattacks, autonomous lethal targeting, or human rights abuses—to the appropriate court. We have a direct cooperation with enforcement agencies for the prosecution of AI crimes under international law.

UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL

For states violating international laws and AI regulations, the UN Security Council may be called upon to support economic sanctions, diplomatic measures, and military interventions in extreme cases.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

AI-related trade disputes and non-compliance with international AI regulations can be addressed through the WTO. IRBAI may coordinate with the WTO to enforce trade restrictions on non-compliant nations or corporations that violate global AI governance standards.

Enforcement Case Examples

AI-Powered Drone Delivery of Prohibited Chemical Weapons

During military conflict, IRBAI discovered that a rogue entity had developed AI-powered drones capable of carrying chemical weapons. These drones were being used to deliver toxic chemical agents to public spaces, putting thousands of lives at risk and violating international arms control agreements.

IRBAI’s Response:

People reported online unusual patterns of AI-driven drone activity near several metropolitan areas. Through close coordination with international intelligence agencies, IRBAI identified the rogue entity behind the development of the chemical delivery system. The AI was found to have been programmed to autonomously identify high-density areas for maximum impact, including crowded public spaces, transportation hubs, and markets.

IRBAI facilitated direct coordination with national governments and military forces to neutralize the AI drones. Drones in flight were intercepted using anti-drone technology, while additional efforts were made to disable communication channels between the drones and their operators. This effort was supported by international defense networks and AI cybersecurity specialists to ensure the safe deactivation of the drones and the disposal of hazardous materials.

As part of its enforcement authority, IRBAI frozen the assets of the corporation in the development and deployment of the AI-powered drones. This included the seizure of financial accounts, intellectual property, and any resources associated with the drone operation. In addition to asset freezes, IRBAI imposed sanctions on the violators, prohibiting them from participating in global AI research and development. IRBAI’s enforcement was designed to sever the capabilities of the rogue entity, preventing any further development of AI systems that could be used in other weapons-related activities.

Given the prohibited use of chemical weapons and AI’s role in facilitating this, IRBAI referred the case to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The corporation’s executives and any state actors involved were considered for prosecution for war crimes and crimes against humanity, with local agencies assisting in their arrest and prosecution.

AI-Driven Cyberattack

In 2026, a corporation developed an AI system designed to carry out cyberattacks on international financial systems. The AI was capable of disrupting critical financial infrastructure, manipulating market data, and causing widespread economic instability. The system posed a severe threat to the global economy, and IRBAI immediately intervened to prevent further damage.

IRBAI’s Response:

IRBAI’s Cybersecurity Team detected suspicious behavior originating from the corporation’s AI system. After a thorough investigation, IRBAI confirmed the AI’s malicious intent to manipulate financial markets and disrupt global financial services. The AI system’s operations were deemed a direct threat to economic security and market stability.

Although IRBAI does not control infrastructure like electricity grids or internet access, it coordinated with national authorities and service providers to limit the corporation’s access to key services. IRBAI utilized internet service providers (ISPs), cloud hosting providers, and telecommunications authorities to suspend the corporation’s access to critical internet infrastructure. This effectively disabled the AI system and stopped the cyberattack from further disrupting global financial markets.

IRBAI worked in coordination with national agencies, to freeze the corporation’s assets globally. This included financial holdings, intellectual property, and any other resources related to the operation and development of the malicious AI system. This freeze was put in place to prevent the corporation from continuing its harmful activities and to stop the AI system from executing further attacks.

Given the severity of the offense, IRBAI referred the case to Interpol for further investigation and prosecution.